All guides

GASB 84 for school districts: a guide to student activity funds

GASB Statement No. 84 changed how districts decide whether student activity money is theirs to report or someone else's they hold. Here's what the standard says, how GASB and the states applied it to clubs and classes, and what business offices can do about it.

David KopfCo-founder, OmellaLast updated November 2026 11 min read

Key takeaways

  • GASB 84 decides whether money a district holds is reported as fiduciary. For student activity funds, the deciding question is whether the district has administrative or direct financial involvement.
  • If students or their parents decide how club money is spent, the funds can stay custodial. If board policy, administrators or faculty advisors decide, or the district sets fees or matches funds, they're governmental.
  • It took effect for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 (the 2020-21 fiscal year for most districts) after GASB postponed it by one year.
  • States applied it differently. Illinois reports student activity funds in the Educational Fund, while Texas expects most to stay in fiduciary fund 865.
  • Most student activity audit findings are about everyday cash controls: receipts, timely deposits, reconciliations and monthly reports.

What GASB 84 is

GASB Statement No. 84, Fiduciary Activities, is the Governmental Accounting Standards Board's standard for identifying fiduciary activities, meaning resources a government holds for someone else, and for reporting them. GASB issued it in January 2017. It applies to state and local governments, and public school districts follow GASB standards.

GASB says the criteria focus on two things: whether the government controls the assets, and who the beneficiaries are. An activity that meets the criteria is reported in a fiduciary fund, with a statement of fiduciary net position and a statement of changes in fiduciary net position (GASB summary).

For K-12 business offices, the biggest change landed on student activity funds: class accounts, clubs, yearbook, student council and similar groups. Many districts used to report these as agency funds. GASB 84 replaced agency funds with custodial funds and set clearer tests for what qualifies (Pennsylvania Department of Education, Texas Education Agency).

The four fiduciary fund types

Statement 84 describes four fiduciary funds that a government should report when they apply (GASB summary, GFOA).

  • Pension (and other employee benefit) trust funds

    What it reports
    Pension and other employee benefit (OPEB) arrangements held in a qualifying trust.
  • Investment trust funds

    What it reports
    Investment pool activity held in a qualifying trust.
  • Private-purpose trust funds

    What it reports
    Other fiduciary activities held in a qualifying trust.
  • Custodial funds

    What it reports
    Fiduciary activities that aren't held in a qualifying trust. This is where fiduciary student activity funds go.

GFOA describes a qualifying trust or equivalent arrangement as one where contributions are irrevocable, assets are dedicated to providing benefits under the benefit terms, and assets are legally protected from the government's creditors.

Fiduciary funds record a liability to beneficiaries when an event compels the government to disburse the resources, such as a demand for the money or no further action being needed to release it (GASB summary). For custodial funds, GFOA notes that additions and deductions are reported by the nature of the resource flows (GFOA).

When student activity funds are custodial or governmental

Most student activity funds are judged under paragraph 11c(2). It treats an activity as fiduciary when "the assets are for the benefit of individuals and the government does not have administrative involvement with the assets or direct financial involvement with the assets" (quoted by the South Carolina Department of Education). The assets also have to be controlled by the district and not come from its own-source revenues (Pennsylvania Department of Education).

Footnote 1 of the Statement gives examples of administrative involvement. A district has it if it monitors compliance with requirements it set, determines eligible expenditures, or has the ability to exercise discretion over how the assets are allocated (Pennsylvania Department of Education). A district that matches student activity resources has direct financial involvement (TEA).

A quick first pass for one student activity account
  1. Does board policy set specific rules for how the group's money can be spent?

    Yes

    Administrative involvement. Likely a governmental fund.

    No
  2. Does the district set the fees the group charges, or match its money?

    Yes

    Administrative or direct financial involvement. Likely a governmental fund.

    No
  3. Can an advisor or administrator approve, reject or change spending at their own discretion?

    Yes

    Administrative involvement. Likely a governmental fund.

    No

If students or their parents decide how the money is spent and the other criteria are met, it can be reported in a custodial fund.

A simplified reading of footnote 1 and the implementation guide scenarios below. Your auditor makes the final call.

How GASB's implementation guide applies this to student clubs

In June 2019 GASB issued Implementation Guide No. 2019-2, Fiduciary Activities, which works through student club scenarios. The Texas Education Agency reproduces those questions and answers in its GASB 84 FAQ. In summary:

  • Students in the club decide how the money is spent and approve disbursements. The district holds the account.

    Administrative involvement?
    No
    What that points to
    Custodial fund, if the other criteria are met
  • Parents of club members decide how the money is spent.

    Administrative involvement?
    No
    What that points to
    Custodial fund, if the other criteria are met
  • There's no policy, and the faculty advisor can approve, reject or change spending at their discretion.

    Administrative involvement?
    Yes
    What that points to
    Governmental fund
  • A board policy sets specific guidelines for how club money can be spent.

    Administrative involvement?
    Yes
    What that points to
    Governmental fund
  • The school board sets the fees clubs charge their members.

    Administrative involvement?
    Yes
    What that points to
    Governmental fund
  • The board policy only names authorized signers and bans spending on illegal activities.

    Administrative involvement?
    No
    What that points to
    Custodial fund, if the other criteria are met

Summarized from the implementation guide scenarios as reproduced by TEA. Read the full questions before applying them.

When student activity funds are governmental, they go in the general fund, or in a special revenue fund if they meet the GASB 54 definition of restricted or committed fund balance (New York State Comptroller). Your state's chart of accounts usually decides which.

Effective dates and later guidance

  • January 2017. GASB issues Statement No. 84 (GASB).
  • Original effective date. Reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, which TEA described as the 2019-20 fiscal year (TEA).
  • June 2019. GASB issues Implementation Guide No. 2019-2, Fiduciary Activities (GASB).
  • May 2020. Statement No. 95 postpones Statement 84 and Implementation Guide 2019-2 by one year to give governments relief during COVID-19 (GASB).
  • Result. Statement 84 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 (GASB). For districts on a July to June year, that's 2020-21. Early application was allowed, but a statement couldn't be partially implemented (Wisconsin DPI).

GASB's status page for Statement 84 also shows later changes: Statement No. 97 amended paragraph 7 (part of the fiduciary component unit criteria), Statement No. 92 amended paragraphs 22 and 25, and Implementation Guide No. 2020-1 is listed as further interpretive guidance (GASB). Ask your auditor whether any of these affect your district.

How states applied GASB 84 to student activity funds

GASB sets the standard. State education agencies set fund numbers and often add their own rules, and state law can create administrative involvement on its own. That's why the same standard led to different answers.

  • Illinois

    What the state says
    Because of the board's administrative involvement, student activity funds are reported in the Educational Fund, with revenue in account 1799 and expenditures in 1999. The activity fund treasurer reconciles bank and investment balances with the fund's liabilities monthly and sends a monthly report to group members and the board (23 Ill. Adm. Code 100.80, ISBE).
  • Texas

    What the state says
    TEA expects most student activity funds to stay in fiduciary fund 865. Activities that qualify as special revenue go in fund 461, and a fee set by the district counts as administrative control (TEA).
  • Louisiana

    What the state says
    State law directs how school activity funds are administered, so they're governmental and reported in a special revenue fund from 2020-21 (Louisiana Department of Education).
  • New Jersey

    What the state says
    Student activity funds are reported in the special revenue fund, and any fund balance is classified as restricted (NJ Department of Education).
  • New York

    What the state says
    The State Comptroller expects district officials to have administrative involvement in many cases, so these funds will likely be reported in a governmental fund (NY State Comptroller).
  • South Carolina

    What the state says
    Classification is decided fund by fund. Funds with administrative involvement move to special revenue funds (SC Department of Education).
  • Pennsylvania

    What the state says
    Each district reviews each activity fund against the criteria, and board policy is the main factor (Pennsylvania Department of Education).

Common audit findings

Classification is one question. Most findings in student activity audits are about basic cash handling. A few examples from state audit reports:

  • Missing paperwork. Student treasurers and advisors didn't keep pre-numbered tickets and receipts or profit and loss statements, checks weren't countersigned, and middle school bank reconciliations were done incorrectly, so clubs and the board saw inaccurate balances (NY State Comptroller, Bethpage UFSD).
  • Late deposits. In the same audit, 27 of 81 receipted collections were deposited 8 to 22 days after the clerk received them, when procedures required seven days (NY State Comptroller).
  • No policy, unapproved clubs. Clubs operated without approval, the board hadn't adopted a comprehensive policy, and 72 of 90 transactions tested weren't properly accounted for by the club (NY State Comptroller, Brookhaven-Comsewogue UFSD).
  • No monthly reporting. The board didn't receive monthly extra-classroom activity fund reports, and collections lacked supporting records (NY State Comptroller, Salem CSD).
  • Unreported shortages. An auditor's cash count found a high school's ASB fund $1,161 short, and the loss wasn't reported as state law requires (Washington State Auditor).

None of these are exotic. They come from many small cash transactions, handled by busy staff, with too little documentation between the event and the bank.

Practical steps for business offices

Classify and document

  1. List every student activity and school-level account, by building.
  2. For each one, write down who decides how money is raised and spent, and whether the district sets fees or adds money.
  3. Compare that with board policy and the implementation guide scenarios above.
  4. Agree the classification with your auditor and record the reasoning.
  5. Set up fund and account codes from your state's chart of accounts before the next collection starts.

Tighten internal controls and cash handling

The NCES handbook for school accounting recommends that the board approve each activity fund, that receipts use pre-numbered forms, and that receipts be deposited intact and daily (NCES). It also recommends separating three duties: signing checks, keeping the fund's accounting records and reconciling bank statements. Two people should count collected cash and sign a receipt for the total. GFOA adds that one person shouldn't both receive and record revenue, and that electronic payment methods reduce overall risk where feasible (GFOA).

Fewer cash boxes, cleaner books

See how districts use Omella to collect online, track every payment by school and account code, and keep the business office in the loop.

Book a demo

Reconcile and report every month

NCES recommends reconciling activity fund bank statements as soon as they arrive and preparing a monthly report for each student organization, which the sponsor checks against their own records (NCES). In Illinois, monthly reconciliation and reporting are required by rule (23 Ill. Adm. Code 100.80).

Our companion guides go deeper: student activity fund controls and event cash handling and reconciling online school payments by account code.

Where a payment system like Omella fits

No software decides your fund classification. That depends on your board policy and who controls spending, and your auditor reviews it. A payment system changes something more practical: how much cash moves through school offices, and how quickly each payment lands in the right account.

Here's what Omella does for business offices:

  • Families pay online by card or with free ACH bank transfer, so schools count and carry less cash.
  • Payments are organized by school and activity, and land in one report by account code. Card reader and online payments show up in the same report.
  • Account codes can be added after money has been collected, and past transactions and reports update.
  • The business office sees collections, payouts and account codes across schools, while staff get the access their role needs.
  • Every payment and response can stream into a Google spreadsheet in real time.
  • For Skyward® districts, payments sync back, so Skyward® is always up to date.

Omella is free for schools and makes money from optional tips at checkout. Card processing is 3.99% + $0.30, and districts can pass card fees to payers or absorb them. See pricing for the details, or read how reconciliation works and what Omella does for the business office.

Common questions

What is GASB 84?

GASB Statement No. 84, Fiduciary Activities, is the accounting standard that tells state and local governments, including public school districts, which activities to report as fiduciary and how to report them. GASB issued it in January 2017.

When did GASB 84 take effect for school districts?

For reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. GASB first set December 15, 2018, then postponed it by one year with Statement No. 95 in May 2020. For districts on a July to June fiscal year, that's the 2020-21 year. Early application was allowed.

Are student activity funds fiduciary or governmental under GASB 84?

It depends on administrative and direct financial involvement. If students or their parents decide how the money is spent and the other criteria are met, the funds can be reported in a custodial fund. If board policy, administrators or faculty advisors decide, or the district sets club fees or matches funds, they're governmental. Illinois, Louisiana and New Jersey direct governmental reporting, while Texas expects most to stay fiduciary.

What replaced agency funds?

Custodial funds. They report fiduciary activities that aren't held in a qualifying trust, and they present additions and deductions in a statement of changes in fiduciary net position.

Does GASB 84 require monthly reconciliations?

No. GASB 84 is a financial reporting standard. Monthly reconciliation and reporting come from state rules, such as 23 Ill. Adm. Code 100.80 in Illinois, and from recommended controls such as those in the NCES school accounting handbook.

Can student activity funds pay staff salaries?

The NCES school accounting handbook recommends strictly prohibiting the use of activity fund receipts to pay any form of compensation directly to employees. Check your state rules and board policy.

Does an online payment system make us GASB 84 compliant?

No software can do that by itself. Classification depends on your board policies and who controls spending, and your auditor reviews it. A payment system can reduce cash handling and make it easier to show where each payment went by account code.

Sources

Links checked November 2026.

Talk it through with our team

See how Omella helps business offices collect online, track every payment by account code and keep schools and the board informed.

Book a demo

Not ready for a call? Email us at contact@omella.com

Qmlativ, Skyward, and the Skyward logo are registered trademarks of Skyward, Inc. All other product and company names should be considered the property of their respective companies and organizations.